Assessment of OpenStreetMap suitability as a data source for network analysis

Piotr Cichociński
AGH University of Science and Technology in Krakow
Faculty of Mining Surveying and Environmental Engineering
Department of Geomatics
Poland

Abstract

For several years now, GIS users have at their disposal the data set constituting some kind of alternative to commercial products. It is the OpenStreetMap (OSM) – a project with the objective to build an editable and available without restrictions map of the world. This map is created based on data from handheld GPS receivers, aerial photographs and other available data sources, as well as sketches made in the field. Acquired information is stored in one central database, from which it can be downloaded as a map image using selected symbols or as vector data.
Data from this source can be used, among others, for network analysis, of which the most widely used and the most common function is finding the optimal route between two points. For the result of this analysis to be considered reliable, the data used must be of appropriate quality.
Because the OSM database is built by volunteers, there are no plans of its systematic development and there is no top-down quality control. Therefore, the paper proposes methods and tools to verify the suitability of the so far collected data for the purposes of network analysis, as well as to correct errors found. Among the quality aspects considered for geographical data, particular attention was paid to the completeness, positional accuracy, topological consistency and temporal accuracy.
The first two problems require in practice comparison with the actual course of roads and streets. To solve the problem of geometric consistency, the use of relevant topological rules examining selected spatial relationships between geographic objects was suggested. When the errors detected this way are marked, they can be corrected using automated methods, and also semi-automatic or manual methods.

Keywords:

data quality; standardization; spatial data; OpenStreetMap; network analysis

Full Text:

PDF (Polish)

References

Cichociński P., 2007: Zastosowanie zaawansowanych reguł topologicznych w procesie budowania baz danych przestrzennych wspomagających wycenę nieruchomości. Roczniki Geomatyki t. 5, z. 3, PTIP, Warszawa.

Cichociński P., Dębińska E., 2012: Badanie dostępności komunikacyjnej wybranej lokalizacji z wykorzystaniem funkcji analiz sieciowych. Roczniki Geomatyki, t. 10, z. 4, PTIP, Warszawa.

Ciepłuch B., Jacob R., Mooney P., Winstanley A., 2010: Comparison of the accuracy of OpenStreetMap for Ireland with Google Maps and Bing Maps. Proceedings of the Ninth International Symposium on Spatial Accuracy Assessment in Natural Resources and Environmental Sciences. Leicester, UK, 20-23 July 2010.

Ciepłuch B., Mooney P., Winstanley A., 2011: Building Generic Quality Indicators for OpenStreetMap. Proceedings of the 19th annual conference of GIS Research UK (GISRUK 2011). Portsmouth, 27-29 April 2011.

Czernik Z., 2012: Samorządy powoli zauważają OSM. [W:] Portal polskiej społeczności OpenStreetMap. http://openstreetmap.org.pl/osm/2012/samorzady-powoli-zauwazaja-osm/

Esri, 1998: ESRI Shapefile Technical Description. An ESRI White Paper. Environmental Systems Research Institute. Redlands.

Fischer M.M., 2003: GIS and Network Analysis. ERSA conference papers. 43rd European Congress of the European Regional Science Association. Jyväskylä, Finland, 27th-30th August 2003.

Girres J.-F., Touya G., 2010: Quality Assessment of the French OpenStreetMap Dataset. Transactions in GIS, 2010, 14(4): 435-459.

Goodchild M.F., Hunter G.J., 1997: A Simple Positional Accuracy Measure for Linear Features. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 11(3): 299-306.

Haklay M., Weber P., 2008: OpenStreetMap: User-Generated Street Maps. IEEE Pervasive Computing, October–December 2008, s. 12-18.

Haklay M., 2010: How good is volunteered geographical information? A comparative study of OpenStreetMap and Ordnance Survey datasets. Environment and Planning B, 37(4): 682-703.

Hanguet J.F., 1995: Computation of the Hausdorff distance between plane vector polylines. Proceedings of AUTO-CARTO 12, 4: 1-10.

Hunter G.J., 1999: New tools for handling spatial data quality: moving from academic concepts to practical reality. URISA Journal, 11(2): 25-34.

Husdal J., 1999: Network analysis – network versus vector – A comparison study. http://www.husdal.com/1999/10/11/network-analysis-raster-versus-vector-a-comparison-study/

Krawczyk A., 2012: Możliwości wykorzystania personalnej bazy danych przestrzennych SpatiaLite w praktyce górniczej. Roczniki Geomatyki t. 10, z. 2: 45-49, PTIP, Warszawa.

Michalak J., 2007: Otwarte oprogramowanie i otwarte dane w geomatyce. Roczniki Geomatyki t.5, z. 2, PTIP, Warszawa.

Mondzech J., Sester M., 2011: Quality Analysis of OpenStreetMap Data Based on Application Needs. Cartographica 46:2, 115-125.

PN-EN ISO 19113, 2002: Informacja geograficzna – Podstawy opisu jakości

PN-EN ISO 19114, 2005: Informacja geograficzna – Procedury oceny jakości

PN-EN ISO 9000, 2006: System zarządzania jakością -- Podstawy i terminologia

Vivid Solutions, 2005: RoadMatcher. http://www.vividsolutions.com/ products.asp?catg=spaapp&code=roadmatcher

Zaborowski A., 2010: Szczecin najbardziej kompletnym miastem. [W:] OpenStreetMap i okolice. Wolne dane w praktyce. http://blog.openstreetmap.pl/2010/szczecin-najbardziej-kompletnym-miastem

Zaborowski A., 2011: Hiszpański kataster uwolniony. [W:] OpenStreetMap i okolice. Wolne dane w praktyce. http://blog.openstreetmap.pl/2011/hiszpanski-kataster-uwolniony

Zielstra D., Zipf A., 2010: A Comparative Study of Proprietary Geodata and Volunteered Geographic Information for Germany. Proceedings of the 13th AGILE International Conference on Geographic Information Science. 10-14 May 2010, Guimarães, Portugal.